After more than 25 years in the financial advice world it appears to me our industry is finally growing into adulthood. For the first time, all financial advisors must now conduct business in a manner appropriate to the incredible responsibility allowed us by our clients. Simply put, the industry will require itself (thanks for the nudge Uncle Sam!) to put a client’s interests first in the recommendation and implementation of financial strategies and plans. Seems pretty straightforward right? Apparently only if this level of diligence DOES NOT get in the way of the advisor making his Mercedes lease payment (name your indulgence here). I have been asked many times by friends and clients – ‘hasn’t this always been a rule?’ Well no, but it should have been.
Hasn’t this always been a rule?
Last week the Department of Labor Rule regarding a uniform standard for defining a fiduciary went into effect (technically this only applies to retirement accounts…for now). And in spite of all the lobbying and hand-wringing by certain elements of our industry, this is a very necessary and positive step forward. When reading an article in Barron’s a couple of weeks ago, (link below) it became clear to me that this is another important evolution in the industry, and the change will create winners and losers. And, you guessed it, the potential losers are making all the noise.
For virtually my entire career I have been operating in the fiduciary environment of a bank trust company, a fee-only advisory firm or a single family office. It never occurred to me we needed someone to define fiduciary for us – regardless of whether or not the legal distinction of a trustee was required. All day every day, including Saturdays and Sundays, you did the right thing for the client. End of story. But given the financial largess available to a high producing advisor, there are plenty of ways to live in the gray area.
So how does an advisory firm inoculate its practice from the implications of this new rule? Simple. It evaluates how it is paid for services and what incentives are in place that might cause the firm or its employees to trip the fiduciary wire. The firm then ensures the strategies utilized and the products recommended are the most likely to allow the client to achieve the financial objectives established. Beyond that, there are some documentation requirements and procedural changes that a compliance consultant will give you heartburn over – but those are only painful on the front end. The end result is a better business and client service model.
So as the Fiduciary Rule goes live, know that it is yet another necessary and appropriate evolution. And if you get frustrated by the change, just remember that the industry brought this on itself over time by often not acting in the client’s best interest.
Going forward, clients will demand the fiduciary standard be a part of every practice, and the advisors that seize the moment will be the winners in the transition.
For more thoughts on ways to evolve your investment approach click here.
This website and the data herein is not a solicitation to invest in any investment product nor is it intended to provide investment advice. It is intended for information purposes only and should be used by investment professionals and investors who are knowledgeable of the risks involved. No representation is made that any investment will or is likely to achieve results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. While every effort has been made to provide data from sources considered to be reliable, no guarantee of accuracy is given. Historical data are presented for informational purposes only. Investment programs described herein contain significant risks. A secondary market may not exist or develop for some investments portrayed. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
Investment decisions should be made based on the investors specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, tax liability, risk tolerance and other relevant factors. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy discussed herein. Investors should consider the underlying funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The Advisor’s ADV, which contains this and other important information, should be read carefully before investing. ETFs trade like stocks and may trade for less than their net asset value. Blueprint Investment Partners, LLC (“Blueprint” or the “Advisor”) is registered as an investment adviser with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Registration does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the SEC nor does it indicate that the Adviser has attained a particular level of skill or ability.
Indexes are unmanaged and do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses. Blueprint’s risk-management process includes an effort to monitor and manage risk, but should not be confused with and does not imply low risk or the ability to control risk. There are risks associated with any investment approach, and Blueprint strategies have their own set of risks to be aware of. First, there are the risks associated with the long-term strategic holdings for each of the strategies. The more aggressive the Blueprint strategy selected, the more likely the strategy will contain larger weights in riskier asset classes, such as equities. Second, there are distinct risks associated with Blueprint Strategies’ shorter-term tactical allocations, which can result in more concentration towards a certain asset class or classes. This introduces the risk that Blueprint could be on the wrong side of a tactical over-weight, thus resulting in a drag on overall performance or loss of principal.
International investments may involve additional risks, which could include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, political instability, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.